Free Movement of Goods

185 played - 9 yrs ago
A quiz about free movement of goods within the European Union
30 QUESTIONS
41%
1
Which article prohibits customs duties?
   
   
   
   
   
2
Which case holds that the prohibition of customs duties applies even when they did not have protectionism in mind?
   
   
   
   
   
3
Which article governs charges having equivalent effect?
   
   
   
   
   
4
Which case held that you are allowed to recover costs from inspections that are mandatory and uniform under EU law?
   
   
   
   
   
5
Which article governs prohibition on discriminatory taxes?
   
   
   
   
   
6
Which case held that indirectly discriminatory tax provisions are also unlawful?
   
   
   
   
   
7
Which case held that discrimination once they are within the state is also unlawful?
   
   
   
   
   
8
Which case relates to quantitative restrictions?
   
   
   
   
   
9
Which case held that "All trading rules enacted by Member States which are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-Community trade" are not allowed?
   
   
   
   
   
10
Which case held that indistinctly applicable rules can be measures having equivalent effect if they have the potential for restricting trade?
   
   
   
   
   
11
Which case said that selling arrangements are not measures having equivalent effect?
   
   
   
   
   
12
Which case held that governments can be responsible for the actions of private individuals if they hinder trade?
   
   
   
   
   
13
Which case relates to indirect discrimination
   
   
   
   
   
14
Which case held that intentions do not matter all that matters is whether a trade barrier is created?
   
   
   
   
   
15
Which case held that provisions which amount to an effective ban are not allowed?
   
   
   
   
   
16
Which case held that advertising restrictions count where they would effect foreign products more than domestic ones?
   
   
   
   
   
17
Which article contains the Treaty based derogations?
   
   
   
   
   
18
Which case held that indirectly discriminatory tax provisions may be justified if there is some objective policy reason which justifies them?
   
   
   
   
   
19
Which of these cases was lawful?
   
   
   
   
   
20
Which case held that public morality is for the member state to determine?
   
   
   
   
   
21
What did the restriction relate to in Officiers van Justitie v Sandoz?
   
   
   
   
   
22
Which case gives rise to a list of areas where there may be justification for indistinctly applicable measures having equivalent effect?
   
   
   
   
   
23
Which case said you must balance fundamental rights with free movement of goods?
   
   
   
   
   
24
Which case relates to environmental protection?
   
   
   
   
   
25
Which case relates to protection of children?
   
   
   
   
   
26
Which case held that a Member State should choose means which least restrict free movement of goods?
   
   
   
   
   
27
Which case held that restrictions cannot be based on purely hypothetical situations?
   
   
   
   
   
28
What was not allowed in Commission v Italy (Re Statistical Levy)?
   
   
   
   
   
29
What was not allowed in Mickelsson and Roos?
   
   
   
   
   
30
Which case held that general restrictions on advertising are not allowed?
   
   
   
   
   

All comments (0)


Add in a Facebook