Classic Classic Quiz Free Movement of Services by Diamondsareforever Diamondsareforever 27 played - 11 yrs ago A quiz about free movement of services within the European Union QUIZ 24 QUESTIONS expert Europe 1 Which article prohibits restrictions on free movement of services? Art. 56Art. 49Art. 62Art. 57Art. 29 2 Which article prohibits restrictions on freedom of establishment? Art. 56Art. 62Art. 57Art. 29Art. 49 3 Which article defines economic activity? Art. 57 tfeuArt. 56 tfeuArt. 62 tfeuArt. 28 tfeuArt. 26 tfeu 4 Which case held that state schools are not services? WirthRi. sanHumbelGervaisTourist Guides Greece 5 Which case held that private schools are services? WirthRi. sanGervaisTourist Guides GreeceGebhard 6 Which case outlined criteria that should be looked at to establish temporary character? GroganLuisi & CarboneHumbelGebhardWirth 7 Which two cases relate to residual application? Luisi & Carbone & HumbelGrogan & GebhardWirth & RI. SANGervais & Tourist Guides GreeceGebhard & Luisi & Carbone 8 Which case held that the movement of someone to receive a service counts as movement of services? Luisi and CarboneAlpine InvestmentsRaynersAttanasioGrogan 9 Which case held that it is possible to have movement of services without anyone actually moving? Luisi and CarboneReynersAlpine InvestmentsAttanasioViking 10 Which article is directly effective according to Reyners? Art. 54 tfeuArt. 2 tfeuArt. 49 tfeuArt. 74 tfeuArt. 63 tfeu 11 What were held to be establishments in Attanasio? Road side service stationsLeaflets about abortionLawyers officesInsurance providersPrivate schools 12 Which case held that an establishment must have a "stable and continuous basis"? Commission v GermanyRi. sanGervaisReynersGebhard 13 Which case held that prohibiting a company from leaving to establish in another member state counts as a restriction? ArbladeDaily MailOrdre de Avocats v KloppKraus v Land Baden-WuttembergSager 14 Which case held that discrimination on grounds of nationality is expressly prohibited? ArbladeOrdre de Avocats v KloppKraus v Land Baden-WuttembergSagerDaily Mail 15 Which case held that discrimination is where it hampers or renders less attractive? Kraus v Land Baden-WuttembergSagerArbladeMobistar v Commune de FleronDaily Mail 16 Which case held that discrimination is where it renders less advantageous? Viacom Outdoor v Giotto Immobilier and OthersOrdre de Avocats v KloppGroganMobistar v Commune de FleronAlpine Investments 17 What was a restriction in Kohll? No providing reimbursement for health care received abroadRule ensuring that barristers receiving sufficient contact with clientsHanding out of leaflets about abortion clinicsCold callingRule forcing insurers to insure people 18 Which case gave rise to a list of reasons why a restriction will be allowed? Van Binsbergen v Bedrifsvereniging MetaalnijverheidPresidente del Consiglio dei Ministri v Regione SardegnaGebhardCommission v ItalyCarpenter 19 Which case held that you can prevent a company from leaving if it is clearly improper or fraudulant? CartesioKohllGeraets-Smits and PeerboomsWattsCentros 20 Which case held that rules preventing people from moving to receive healthcare elsewhere were not justifiable under Public Health? KohllGeraets-Smits and PeerboomsWattsKraus v Land Baden-WuttembergCartesio 21 Which case defined what is normal health care? WattsKraus v Land Baden-WuttembergGeraets-Smits and PeerboomsCartesioKohll 22 Which case held that you cannot base refusal to receive healthcare abroad on waiting lists alone? Kraus v Land Baden-WuttembergGuiotWebbCommission v GermanyWatts 23 What was disproportionate in Guiot? Social security paymentsPolice checksSubjecting service provider to rules of established companiesWaiting listsMedical necessity 24 Which case laid out criteria under which you can assess whether a qualification can be mutually recognised? VlassopoulouKnoorsCommission v GermanyUNECTEF v HeylensWebb A mistake in this Quiz ? Contact the author Commentaires
