Classic Classic Quiz Free Movement of Workers by Diamondsareforever Diamondsareforever 166 played - 11 yrs ago A quiz about free movement of workers within the European Union QUIZ 30 QUESTIONS expert Europe 1 Which article of the TFEU relates to free movement of workers? 4549625868 2 When was Directive 2004/58 created? 19572004-2006196419681970-1993 3 Which case showed that the horizontal effect provisions are not fully clear? Walrave & KochBosmanR v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte AntonissenWoutersLebon 4 What is the equivalent of mandatory requirements in free movement of workers? Imperative of general interestDiscriminatoryNon-discriminatory obstacleIndistinctly applicableIndirect discrimination 5 Which case showed that job seekers do not have the same rights as those who have work? R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte AntonissenDiatta v Land BerlinLebonNetherlands v ReedR v LAT and Surinder Singh, ex parte Sec. State for the Home Dept. 6 Which of these is not a family member under Dir. 2004/58 Art. 2 (2)? SpouseRegistered PartnerUncle/Aunt(grand) childDependent 7 Which case overruled Akrich? Netherlands v ReedMetock v Minister for JusticeR v LAT and Surinder Singh, ex parte Sec. of State for the Home Dept.Adoui and Cornuaille v BelgiumVan Duyn v Home Office 8 Which of these is not a treaty derogation? Public PolicyLinguistic exceptionPublic securityPublic healthPublic service 9 What does Dir. 1964/221 require? Adequate proofDirect discriminationIndirect discriminationNon-discriminatory obstacleDisease with epidemic potential 10 Which of these is not a general rule on public health, public policy or public security? No economic motiveProportionalityThe 10 year rulePersonal conductNo arbitrary distinction 11 What provides for the abolition of discrimination? Reg. 1612/68Art. 18 tfeuTfeu art. 45 (2)Art. 21 tfeuDir. 2004/38 Art. 24 (1) 12 Which of these cases relates to non-discriminatory obstacles? TerhoeveCommission v FranceUgliolaLebonCristini v SNCF 13 Which case held that family members are entitled to the same rights as workers? LebonCommission v FranceCristini v SNCFUgliolaKobler v Austria 14 Which of these gives rise to rights regarding access to employment? Reg. 1612/68 Art. 4Reg. 1612/68 Art. 3Reg. 1618/68 Art. 6Reg. 1612/68 Art. 7 (1)Reg. 1618/68 Art. 8 15 Which case expanded social advantages to include all those granted to national workers? Michel SCristini v SNCFInzirilloReinaCommission v Greece 16 What gave rise to the idea that children are entitled to all forms of education? Reg. 1612/68 Art. 9Reg. 1612/68 Art. 7 (3)Reg. 1612/68 Art. 7 (2)Reg. 1612/68 Art. 12Dir. 2004/38 Art. 4 & 5 17 Which case allowed states to charge an enrollment fee even when nationals did not have to pay such a fee? Belgium v HumbelGravier v City of LiegeBlaizot v University of LiegeLair v University of HanoverGul 18 Which case proves an example of a worker receiving a maintenance grant? Belgium v HumbelGulLair v University of HanoverMattern v CikoticCommission v Belgium 19 What gives rise to the right to reside in a host member state? Reg. 1612/68 Art. 7 (3)Reg. 1612/68 Art. 12Dir. 2004/38 Art. 6Reg. 1612/68 Art. 7 (2)Dir. 2004/38 Art. 4 20 What gives rise to the public service exception? Reg. 1612/68 Art. 3 (1)Art. 45 (4) tfeuArt. 9 tfeuArt. 18 tfeuArt. 25 tfeu 21 Which case gave rise to the definition of a public service post? Commission v BelgiumLawri-Blum v Land Baden-WurttembergGroener v Minnister for EducationRoland SchumackerDu Cuyper 22 What language did the case of Groener v Minister for Education relate to? IrishEnglishWelshFrenchSwedish 23 Which of these is not a case relating to objective justification? Commission v BackmannRoland SchumackerDe CuyperTas-HagenLebon 24 Which case gave rise to the general statement that EU citizenship will allow nationals of member states equal rights irrespective of their nationality? CollinsBaumbestGrezelcykMicheletti and OthersGarca Avello 25 Which of these is not a step that must be met in order to place restrictions on an EU citizens rights following Tas Hagen? DiscriminatoryObjective considerations of public interestIndependent of the NationalityProportionateAppropriate 26 Why was the residency requirement justifiable in Foster? In the public interestWas not discriminatorySocial integrationWas proportionateWas appropriate 27 Following Micheletti and Others who must member states give EU citizenship to? Member state nationalDual nationality (two non member states)Dual nationality (member state & non member state)Dual nationality (two member states)Non-member state national 28 Which case gave rise to the idea that citizenship provision on the right of residence is directly effective? CollinsBaumbastMicheletti and OthersGarcia AvelloGrzelcyk 29 What was the party entitled to in Grzelczyk? Job seekers allowanceTransitional grantLawful residenceEU citizenshipDual nationality 30 What is lex generalis? Specific privileges granted by the TreatyEU citizenship is derivativeEquality of citizensFree movement of personsUnreasonable burdons A mistake in this Quiz ? Contact the author Commentaires
