Classic Classic Quiz Copyright in Designs by Diamondsareforever Diamondsareforever 1 played - 9 yrs ago A quiz on the cross over between copyright law and design law QUIZ 13 QUESTIONS medium 1 Which section of the CDPA lists the types of subject matter covered by copyright protection? S 1(1)S 4(1)S 4(2)S 1(6)S 3(4) 2 Which section of the CDPA defines artistic works? S 4(1)S 1(1)S 4(2)S 2(5)S 4(5) 3 Which section of the CDPA defines buildings, photographs, sculptures and graphic works? S 4(1)S 1S 4(2)S 5S 1(6) 4 What is this a definition of "a cast or model made for the purposes of..." SculpturePhotographGraphic workBuildingLiterary work 5 Which section of the CDPA defines copying? S 5S 17(3)S 7S 19(4)S 1 6 In which case did copies of popeye dolls infringe the cartoon drawings of popeye? British Leyland v Armstrong Patents Co Ltd (1986)Lucas Film v Ainsworth (2011)Fulton v Totes Isotener (2004)Farmers Build v Carrier Bulk Materials (1998)King Features Syndicate Inc v Kleeman Ltd (1941) 7 In which case was the principle of non-derogation from grant applied to goods? Lucas Film v Ainsworth (2011)King Features Syndicate Inc v Kleeman Ltd (1941)Fulton v Totes Isotener (2004)British Leyland v Armstrong Patents Co Ltd (1986)Farmers Build v Carrier Bulk Materials (1998) 8 How long could offering copyright protection give the owner a de facto monopoly for? Life of the author + 50 yearsLife of the author + 70 yearsLife of the author + 10 yearsLife of the author + 90 yearsLife of the author + 80 years 9 Which article of the CDPA provides a defence when an article is created froma design document that is not an artistic work? S 20S 11S 16S 43S 51 10 In which case was there a limited understanding of artistic work with relation to sculpture? Lucas Film v Ainsworth (2011)British Leyland v Armstrong Patents Co Ltd (1986)King Feature Syndicate Inc v Kleeman Ltd (1941)Fulton v Totes Isotener (2004)Farmers Build v Carrier Bulk Materials (1998) 11 How long is registered design protection? 25 years3 years10 years15 years20 years 12 What might the section mentioned above be contrary to? Plant Variety DirDesign DirDatabase DirInfosoc DirTerm Dir 13 Under which case was the item not protected by copyright law as it served a 'utilitarian' purpose? British Leyland v Armstrong Patents Co Ltd (1986)Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth (2011)King Features Sydicate Inc v Kleeman Ltd (1941)Fulton v Totes Isotoner (2004)Farmers Build v Carrier Bulk Materials (1998) Commentaires
