Classic Classic Quiz The Beneficiary Principle in Trusts Law by Diamondsareforever Diamondsareforever 41 played - 11 yrs ago A quiz about the beneficiary principle in trusts law QUIZ 16 QUESTIONS expert 1 Which case held that if you can show a purpose is charitable then it is valid? Morice v Bishop of DurhamRe Gillingam Bus Disaster FundRe DouglasIRC v Broadway Cottages TrustRe Dean 2 Which case held that trusts for the care of animals are valid? Re EndacottRe ThompsonBourne v KeaneRe Andrews STRe Dean 3 Which case held that money for gravestones was OK? Re ThompsonRe EndacottBourne v KeaneRe DeanRe Andrews ST 4 Which case held that money for memorials was too excessive? Bourne v KeaneRe ThompsonRe DeanRe EndacottRe Andrews ST 5 Which case held that money for saying masses for the soul was valid? Re DeanRe EndacottBourne v KeaneRe ThompsonRe Andrews ST 6 What was the trust for in Re Andrews ST? Horse and houndsGravestoneMemorialChildren of Bishop of JerusalemSaying masses for the soul 7 Which case related to a gift to a person being limited for a purpose? Re AndrewRe Sandersons TrustRe Denley's TDRe Trusts of the Abbott FundMcPhail v Doulton 8 Give an example of an interest that vests when it takes effect? Grandchild being bornTrust for 30 yearsTrust for the maintenance of brotherTrust to care for animalsTrust to maintain a gravestone 9 Which case gave the definition of an unincorporated association? Leahy v A-G for New South WalesRe DenleyRe Bucks Constabulary FundNeville Estates v MaddenRe Rechers WT 10 Which case gave rise to the three fold classification under the contract holding theory? Neville Estates v MaddenRe Rechers WTRe Lipinskis WTRe Grants WTHunt v MacLaren (Re Horley Town FC) 11 Which case held that contract holding theory applies to both inward and outward looking associations? Re Lipinskis WTHunt v MacLaren (Re Horley Town FC)Hatchett-Stamford v A-GRe Grants WTRe Rechers WT 12 Which case held that when an association is left to one member the property becomes owner less? Re DenleyHunt v MacLaren (Re Horley Town FC)Hatchett-Stamford v A-GConservative and Unionist Central Office v BurrellQuistclose 13 Which case relates to the mandate theory? Conservative and Unionist Central Office v BurrellBarclays Bank v QuistcloseRe DenleyRe West Sussex Constabulary FundRe Bucks Constabulary Fund 14 Which of these persons would not get their money back under Re West Sussex Constabulary Fund? Employed personMember of the clubSomeone who bought a disco ticketMember of the committeeSomeone who donated a large sum 15 Which case held that if there is nothing explicit then the surplus funds should go back to members? Davis v Richards & WallingtonAir Jamaica v CharltonRe West SussexRe Bucks Constabulary FundRe Denley 16 Which case held that an employer is entitled to pension fund surplus? Air Jamaica v CharltonDavis v Richards & WallingtonRe BucksRe West SussexRe Denley A mistake in this Quiz ? Contact the author Commentaires
