Classic Classic Quiz Knowing Receipt and Knowing Assistance by Diamondsareforever Diamondsareforever 13 played - 11 yrs ago A quiz about knowing receipt and knowing assistance in the law of trusts QUIZ 19 QUESTIONS expert 1 What is another way of saying trusteeship de son tort? IntermeddlingPersonal liabilityProprietary liabilityPersonal liability for strangersLiability as a recipient 2 What occurred in Blyth v Fladgate? Knowing receiptKnowing assistanceEquitable proprietary claimLiability as an accessoryTrusteeship de son tort 3 Which scale used to be used to determine fault and knowledge? Societe Generale scaleActual knowledge scaleBelmont Williams scaleFraudulent knowledge scaleBaden Delvaux scale 4 Which of these things closely relates to stage 5 of the scale? Implied noticeActual noticeActual knowledgeImplied knowledgeConstructive notice 5 Which 1979 case said R was liable if they had constructive knowledge? International Sales and Agencies Ltd v MarcusCarl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert SmithBelmont Finance v Williams Furniture (no 2)Re Montagu's SettlementEagle Trust v SBC Securities 6 Which 1982 case said constructive knowledge was enough? Belmont Finance v Williams FurnitureInternational Sales and Agencies Ltd v MarcusCarl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert SmithRe Montagu's SettlementEagle Trust v SBC Securities 7 Which case held that R is not liable unless you can show a lack of honesty? Re Montagu's SettlementEagle Trust v SBC SecuritiesCarl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert SmithEl Ajou v Dollar HoldingsHoughton v Fayers 8 Which case involved the property of the Dukes of Manchester? Eagle Trust v SBC SecuritiesRe Montagu's SettlementEl Ajou v Dollar HoldingsHoughton v FayersBelmont Finance v Williams Furniture (no 2) 9 Which case held that R is liable if a reasonable person would have known and therefore R knew unless R can prove otherwise? Re Montagu's SettlementEagle Trust v SBC SecuritiesEl Ajou v Dollar HoldingsHoughton v FayersBelmont Finance v Williams Furniture (no 2) 10 Which case held that R was liable up to 4 on the scale? Re Montagu's SettlementEagle Trust v SBC SecuritiesEl Ajou v Dollar HoldingsHoughton v FayersBelmont Finance v Williams Furniture (no 2) 11 Which case reverted the test back to constructive knowledge? Houghton v FayersRe Montagu's SettlementEagle Trust v SBC SecuritiesEl Ajou v Dollar HoldingsBelmont Finance v Williams Furniture 12 Which of these cases did not involve a company director and another company? Re Montagu's SettlementBelmont Finance v Williams Furniture (no 2)International Sales and Agencies Ltd v MarcusEagle Trust v SBC Securities 13 Which case was the first to ask the new question of whether it was unconscionable for R to retain a benefit? BCCI v AkindeleInternational Sales and Agencies Ltd v MarcusCriteria Properties v Straford UK PropertiesThanakharn v Akai HoldingsArmstrong v Winngton Networks 14 Why was the case sent back in Criteria Properties v Straford Properties? The bank had become insolventForgot to ask if there was a valid contractThe interest rate was very generousForgot to ask whether or not the scheme was legalForgot to ask whether any security had been given 15 Which case held that you are unconscionable if you are naive to the point of being irrational? Armstrong v Winngton NetworksFarah Constructions v Say-DeeThanakharn v Akai HoldingsCharter Plc v City Index LtdCity Index v Gawler 16 What case held that R was liable as didn't make the inquiries they should have made? Farah Constructions v Say-DeeArmstrong v Winngton NetworksCharter Plc v City Index LtdCity Index v GawlerBarnes v Addy 17 Which case said that knowing receipt was wrong based? Farah Constructions v Say-DeeCity Index v GawlerBarnes v AddyBaden, Delvaux v Societe GeneraleSelangor United Rubber Estates v Cradock (no 3) 18 Why was the Civil Liability Contribution Act 1978 relevant to Charter Plc v City Index Ltd? Implied strict liabilityShowed that R was negligentAct only applied if it was a wrong based claimShowed the relationship with the equitable proprietary claimMade the case very controversial 19 Which 1874 case held that A was not liable unless he was fraudulent? Baden, Delvaux v Societe GeneraleBarnes v AddySelangor United Rubber Eestates v Cradock (no 3)Royal Brunei Airlines v TanGrupo Toras v Al Sabah A mistake in this Quiz ? Contact the author Commentaires
